• Users Online: 418
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 
Table of Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52-56

Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of boric acid containing toxic sugar baits against Anopheles culicifacies, An. stephensi and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes


ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission02-Dec-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Sep-2021
Date of Web Publication07-Jun-2022

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh C Dhiman
ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-9062.331414

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background & objectives: Attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) is a novel tool which employs mosquito sugar feeding behaviour to kill them. The potential of ATSB against mosquito vectors has been demonstrated in limited scope around the world including Israel, some of the African countries and USA. But their efficacy against mosquito vectors of India is yet to be ascertained. Therefore, current study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of TSB (without attractant) against two important malaria vectors Anopheles culicifacies and An. stephensi along with major dengue vector Aedes aegypti.
Methods: TSB solution was prepared by dissolving different concentrations of boric acid in glucose and tested against each of the mosquito species. Another experiment was done by spraying this boric acid sugar solution on to Calendula officinalis plant. It served as a sole source of mosquito feed and mortality of mosquitoes was counted after 24 hours.
Results: The TSB resulted in 100% mortality of Ae. aegypti and An. stephensi at 4% concentration of boric acid while in An. culicifacies 100% mortality was achieved at 3% concentration TSB solution. TSB solution with 2% boric acid, resulted in 99.1% mortality in An. culicifacies while ~95 % mortality of An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti. When TSB solution with 2% boric acid was sprayed on plant, ~89-94% mortality was observed in both An. stephensi and An. culicifacies.
Interpretation & conclusion: Based on the results, boric acid based toxic sugar bait solution could be a promising tool for vector control. Further studies are needed to find out its toxicity of TSB against non-target organisms and residual efficacy in field trials in different ecotypes.

Keywords: attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB); mosquito vector; boric acid; India; malaria


How to cite this article:
Kumar G, Sharma A, Dhiman RC. Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of boric acid containing toxic sugar baits against Anopheles culicifacies, An. stephensi and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis 2022;59:52-6

How to cite this URL:
Kumar G, Sharma A, Dhiman RC. Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of boric acid containing toxic sugar baits against Anopheles culicifacies, An. stephensi and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 1];59:52-6. Available from: https://www.jvbd.org/text.asp?2022/59/1/52/331414


  Introduction Top


Malaria and dengue are the two most prominent vector borne diseases prevalent in India. During 2019, 0.33 million cases of malaria with 77 deaths and 0.16 million cases of dengue with 166 deaths were reported in India[1]. There are six primary vectors of malaria in the country of which Anopheles culicifacies and An. stephensi cause more than 70% of the malaria cases[2],[3]. For malaria, larval control through larvicides and indoor residual spraying (IRS) along with distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against adult vectors are the operational intervention strategies of the national programme. In India, dengue is mainly transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and vector control is the only option to control dengue. The threat of development of resistance against chemical insecticides poses a major hurdle in the control of mosquito vectors. Therefore, it is necessary to employ additional tools which can be used at a community level to control the mosquito vectors.

The first toxic sugar bait was used by Lea (1965) who used different concentrations of malathion with 20% sucrose solution for feeding of Ae. aegypti resulting in 85% mortality of the mosquitoes[4]. Later, various toxicants were used for adult mosquito control which included boric acid, spinosad, chlorfenapyr and dinotefuran[5],[6],[7],[8]. Due to low mammalian toxicity of boric acid, it has been used in attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) against different species of mosquitoes[9]. ATSB using boric acid was used to control Culex quinquefasciatus in storm drains of Florida[10]. A field trial of ATSB with plant-spraying method was conducted against the malaria vector An. gambiae s.l. in Mali, West Africa[9]. In both these trials, 85–90% reduction in mosquito populations was reported[9],[10]. Evaluation of boric acid baits against Ae. albopictus in tropical environments of Florida was also done, and nearly 52% mortality of mosquitoes was observed[11].

ATSB is a recently developed mosquito vector tool which utilizes sugar feeding behaviour of mosquitoes to lure and kill them by employing an orally ingested toxin[9]. Initially, it was developed in Israel to control the mosquito An. sergentii[5],[12]. Later, ATSB was used to control An. gambiae s.l. populations in Mali and was found to be successful in reducing vector population of mosquitoes by >90%[9]. Additionally, field trials in both Israel and Mali have shown that ATSB not only reduced the total number of mosquitoes, but also reduced the longevity of older mosquitoes[9],[12],[13]. To our knowledge, ATSB has not been evaluated against Indian malaria and dengue vectors. Therefore, here we have tested the efficacy of TSB (without any attractant) against An. culicifacies, An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti under laboratory conditions using boric acid.


  Material & Methods Top


Two species of mosquitoes An. stephensi and An. culicifacies were obtained from the central insectary of ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR-NIMR), New Delhi. F1 generation of field caught Ae. aegypti were used for the study. Adult An. stephensi, An. culicifacies and Ae. aegypti (3–5 day old) were starved for six hours and then used for experiments[14]. Toxic sugar bait (TSB) solution was prepared by dissolving various concentrations of boric acid SRL make with 99.5%, (1%, 2%, 3% and 4% w/v) and glucose (10% w/v) in water.

Evaluation of TSB under laboratory settings

Cotton pads soaked in TSB solution in a disposable plastic bowl were placed into inside Barraud’s cage (30x 30x30 cm). Both male and female mosquitoes (20 each in 1:1 ratio) were introduced into cages and allowed to feed on cotton pad [Figure 1]A. After 24 hours, observations on mortality were taken by scoring live or dead. The experiments were done with three replicates with one control without boric acid (using test species of same generation). Only sugar solution in cotton pads was provided to for control. During the experiment room temperature was maintained at 26–28°C with 70–80% relative humidity and 12:12hr light and dark period. To prevent scavenging ants, legs of table were dipped into water containing plastic bowls.
Figure 1: Laboratory experiment showing evaluation of 2% boric acid in Attractive Toxic Sugar Bait, in cotton pad (A.) and sprayed on plant (B.) on malaria vectors

Click here to view


Knock down of mosquitoes due to boric acid TSB ingestion was determined for two doses of boric acid 2% and 3%. Mortality of An. stephensi and An. culicifacies was recorded every hour upto six hours and thereafter at 24h interval. To assess the residual efficacy of TSB, both male and female An. stephensi mosquitoes (20 each in 1:1 ratio) were exposed to 2% boric acid TSB as per above mentioned procedure in triplicate. The plastic bowl containing the cotton pad was filled with TSB solution so as to keep cotton wet for longer duration. Each day, fresh batch of mosquitoes (from new generation) were introduced in new cages up to 8 days period while the cotton pad soaked in TSB solution remain unchanged. The mortality of mosquitoes was recorded after 24 hr period.

Effect of ATSBs sprayed on plants

The methodology used in the experiment with plants was adapted from Xue et al. (2006)[15]. The experiment was performed using large clothed cages (60x60x60 cm). One commonly available plant Calendula officinalis was selected randomly for the experiment as it was present in fair number in flower pots at the premises of ICMR-NIMR, Delhi. The plant was first washed by spraying water to remove any dust. Once the sprayed water was dried, the plant was sprayed with 50 ml of TSB solution with one control plant sprayed with 10% glucose solution (without boric acid) [Figure 1]. Thereafter, the plant was introduced into each cage [Figure 1]B. One hour after spraying on plants, 100 mosquitoes (1:1 sex ratio) of An. culicifacies and An. stephensi were released in each cage. Mortality of the mosquitoes in each treatment was measured after 24 h. When mortality in control was 5–20 percent, Abbott’s formula was applied to correct the test mortality[16].


  Results Top


The efficacy of TSB resulted in 100% mortality of Ae. aegypti and An. stephensi at 4% concentration of boric acid while in An. culicifacies at 3% concentration TSB solution 100% mortality was achieved. TSB solution with 2% boric acid, resulted in 99.1% mortality in An. culicifacies while ~95% mortality of An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti. When the concentration of boric acid in TSB solution was lowered to 1%, mortality was still higher in An. culicifacies (86.1%) but lower in case of An. stephensi (16.2%) and Ae. aegypti (33.3%) [Table 1].
Table 1: Impact of Toxic Sugar Bait (TSB) on the survival of mosquito vectors

Click here to view


When TSB solution with 2% boric acid was sprayed on plants, 88.9-94.4% mortality was observed in both An. stephensi and An. culicifacies. The mortality of mosquitoes in control (plants sprayed with sugar only) was 10% [Table 2]. Thus, boric acid-based toxic sugar solution was found effective against An. culicifacies, An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes.
Table 2: Impact of 2% boric acid in Toxic Sugar Bait sprayed on plants

Click here to view


To understand how fast the mortality of mosquitoes occurs due to consumption of consumption of TSB containing boric acid, we recorded hourly knock down of mosquitoes for six hours and thereafter mortality was recorded after 24 hr. Results of the test indicated that mortality is very slow (0–5% in An. stephensi and 0–17% in An. culicifacies) initially up to six hours and boric acid ingestion takes time to kill mosquitoes [Figure 2]. There was no significant difference on knock down of mosquitoes with increase of boric acid concentration from 2% to 3% in ATSB used.
Figure 2: Knockdown effect of boric acid ATSB against Indian malaria vectors An. culicifacies and An. stephensi

Click here to view


Experiment on residual efficacy of boric acid containing TSB revealed that boric acid based TSB is effective in controlling An. stephensi mosquitoes for eight days with mortality rate of 91% after 1 day to 59% after 8 days [Figure 3]. Mortality in males (56–92%) was always higher than females (50–91%) but the difference was not significant.
Figure 3: Residual efficacy of ATSB containing 2% boric acid against An. stephensi mosquito

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In the present study, 94–100% mortality in An. culicifacies, An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes was observed with 2–4% boric acid in sugar solution in 24 hours, under laboratory conditions. When sprayed on plants, boric acid based TSB solution also showed good results with ~90% mortality of the mosquitoes after 24 hours. Muller et al. (2010)[9] and Beier et al. (2012)[12] found 90% and 95–100% mortality of An. gambiae and An. sergentii in field studies undertaken in Mali (West Africa) and Israel respectively. Our results are in conformity with studies undertaken on ATSB using 2% boric acid against malaria vectors of West Africa and Israel. The mortality against Aedes and Culex species has been reported lesser than anophelines[11],[15],[17],[18],[19]. In our laboratory study using TSB on plant, 10% mortality was found in An. culicifacies and An. stephensi in control group also, it might be due to innate property of plant or any unidentified natural conditions which may be investigated further. As we use control of the same plant the effect is independent of plant property in test cage and therefore, corrected mortality was used.

Biologically, the male mosquitoes depend exclusively on plant sugars for their survival while female mosquitoes also visit plants for sugar meal. The requirement of Ae. aegypti (being container breeder) for visiting plants for sugar meal appears to be less than An. culicifacies which is a rural malaria vector[20],[21]. It is reflected by high mortality (86.1%) of An. culicifacies in 1% TSB as compared to 33.3 and 16.2% mortality in Ae. aegypti and An. stephensi respectively. As An. culicifacies is outdoor breeder, the mosquitoes are totally dependent on surrounding vegetation. Ae. aegypti and An. stephensi are highly adapted for urban system and indoor container breeder. Therefore, these are less dependent on surrounding vegetation. It cannot be ascertained whether Aedes mosquitoes took less boric acid, which is a matter of further research. The duration of residual efficacy of sugar pad with boric acid was determined for one week period and it effectively killed the mosquitoes with ~60% mortality till 8 days. Therefore, it can be used as an efficient tool to control vector population indoors along with LLIN.

After taking blood meal, the female mosquitoes have to take rest mainly indoors. After the digestion of blood meal, TSB may be taken by female mosquitoes searching sugar source. Therefore, the feasibility of using ATSB indoors, appears more fruitful for controlling female mosquitoes which transmit pathogens. The current study paves the way for further use of ATSB by adding attractant under field conditions in different ecotypes in India. ATSB has the potential for personal protection from mosquito bites, particularly in areas with less vegetation where mosquitoes find scarce source of plants as source of sugar. The ATSB technology is cost effective and can be adopted by the communities for getting relief from mosquito bites and thus reduction in malaria or dengue. Therefore, based on the results, boric acid based toxic sugar bait solution could be a promising tool for vector control and to ascertain that, further studies are needed to find out its toxicity against non-target organisms and its residual efficacy in field trials in different ecotypes.


  Acknowledgements Top


The authors are thankful to laboratory staff particularly Mr. M.C. Sharma and Mr. V.P. Singh for providing necessary help in conducting laboratory experiments. Intramural funds of ICMR-NIMR, Delhi funded the study.

Conflict of interest: None



 
  References Top

1.
NVBDCP (National Vector Borne disease control Program), Malaria situation in India from 2016, 2020. Available from www.nvbdcp.gov.in (Accessed on 15 May 2020).  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Dash AP, Adak T, Raghavendra K, Singh OP. The biology and control of malaria vectors in India. Current Science 2007; 92: 1571–1578.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tikar SN, Mendki MJ, Sharma AK, Sukumaran D, Veer V, Prakash S, et al. Resistance status of the malaria vector mosquitoes, Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles subpictus towards adulticides and larvicides in arid ad semi-arid areas of India. Journal of Insect Science 2011; 11: 1–10.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lea AO. Sugar-baited insecticide residues against mosquitoes. Mosq News 1965; 25: 65–66.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Muller G, Schlein Y. Sugar questing mosquitoes in arid areas gather on scarce blossoms that can be used for control. Int J Par 2006; 36: 1077–1080.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Stewart ZP, Oxborough RM, Tungu PK, Kirby MJ, Rowland MW, Irish SR. Indoor applications of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) in combination with mosquito nets for control of pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e84168.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Khallaayoune K, Qualls WA, Revay EE, Allan SA, Arheart K, Kravchenko VD, et al. Attractive toxic sugar baits: control of mosquitoes with the low-risk active ingredient dinotefuran and potential impacts on nontarget organisms in Morocco. Environmental Entomology 2013; 42(5): 1040–5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Fiorenzano FM, Koehler PG, Xue RD. Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) for control of mosquitoes and its impact on nontarget organisms: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(4): 398.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Muller G, Beier J, Traore SF, Toure MB, Traore MM, Bah S, et al. Successful field trial of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) plant-spraying methods against malaria vectors in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali West Africa. Malaria Journal 2010a; 9: 210.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Muller GC, Junnila A, Qualls WA, Revay EE, Kline DL, Allan SA, et al. Control of Culex quinquefasciatus in a storm drain system in Florida using attractive toxic sugar baits. Med Vet Entomol 2010b; 24: 346–351.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Naranjo DP, Qualls WA, Müller GC, Samson DM, Roque D, Alimi T, et al. Evaluation of boric acid baits against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in tropical environments. Parasitol Res 2013; 112: 1583–1587.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Beier JC, Muller G, Gu W, Kristopher LA, Schlein Y. Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms. Malaria J 2012; 11: 31.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Qualls WA, Müller GC, Traore SF, Traore MM, Arheart K, Doumbia S, et al. Indoor use of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) to effectively control malaria vectors in Mali, West Africa. Malar J 2015; 14: 301.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Furnival-Adams JEC, Camara S, Rowland M, Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Oumbouke AW, et al. Indoor use of attractive toxic sugar bait in combination with long-lasting insecticidal net against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae: an experimental hut trial in Mbé, central Côte. Malar J 2020; 19: 11.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Xue RD, Kline DL, Ali A, Barnard DR. Application of boric acid baits to plant foliage for adult mosquito control. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 2006; 22: 497–500.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Ecol Entomol 1925; 18: 265–467.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wang F, Yuan S, Daniel D, Xue RD. Control of male Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) using boric acid sugar bait and its impact on female fecundity and fertility. Journal of Vector Ecology 2017; 42(1): 203–206.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Sippy R, Galo ER, Valeria S, Heras F, Morejón B, Beltrán E, et al. Ingested insecticide to control Aedes aegypti: developing a novel dried attractive toxic sugar bait device for intra-domiciliary control. Parasites & Vectors 2020; 13: 78.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Gu ZY, He J, Teng XD, Lan CJ, Shen RX, Wang YT, et al. Efficacy of orally toxic sugar baits against contact insecticide resistant Culex quinquefasciatus. Acta Tropica. 2020; 202: 105256.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Edman JD, Strickman, D, Kittayapong P, Scott TW. Female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand rarely feeds on sugar. J Med Entomol 1992; 29: 1035–1038.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Braks MAH, Juliano SA, Lounibos LP. Superior reproductive success on human blood without sugar is not limited to highly anthropophilic mosquito species. Med Vet Entomol 2006; 20: 53–59.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  Material & M...
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed563    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal